![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Spirituality and Skepticism.
Jan. 16th, 2009 03:33 pmOne reason I get so het up over the "fundamentalist" atheists, is that I find myself edging ever closer to atheism with every year, but not through their efforts, merely through a continuation of the thought processes that led me from Christianity to Paganism in the first place. And it's the same impulse that makes me yell at the "fluffy bunny pagans."
"YOU'RE MAKING US LOOK STUPID! STOP IT!"
Do I think I'll ever be truly a "capital 'A' Atheist?" Probably not. Because I have seen or experienced things (at least in my perception) that lead me to reject the sterile realities of the science uber alles crowd. And while I am willing to concede the non-existence of God or Gods, I am not willing to concede that there is nothing "supernatural" out there. I mean seriously, today's magic is tomorrow's science after all, and science is only as good as the one practicing it. What is "supernatural" today, may be perfectly explainable in a year, decade or century. So I'm not willing to close my mind to certain things entirely just because you say so.
Also, I am unwilling to declare that teaching your children a religion or philosophy is, of itself, child abuse. Nor am I willing to declare that under-educating your children is child abuse, because quite frankly that would make millions of parents in under-privileged school districts guilty through no fault of their own (she says thinking "lovingly" of the 25 year old textbooks* of her youth). And I know that those of you declaring that "religion=child abuse" have your hearts in the right places, and the scars of your own religious upbringings fresh on your mind. But dictating no religion, A. Doesn't work (see Soviet Russia) and B. is no better than dictating any religion.
For those of you screeching about how all religion is child abuse and we MUST STOP IT! you need to realize that not everyone's experience of religion=child abuse. Some people, like Ogre, have fond memories of their youthful church attendance, but just could no longer believe in God. Seriously, ask him about Church Camp, or the little old ladies at his church. The stories are freaking hilarious.
I have no problem busting religions/the religious for abusive practices. I personally think that depriving children of medical care because "God said so" IS abuse. I also think that "beating the devil" out of a child or squashing them to death in an exorcism or any other "faith-based" death of a child should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and I do not believe that "it's our faith" is an extenuating circumstance. This goes double for "honor killings." We already have laws outlawing child abuse, we don't need to add "thought crimes" to the already over-burdened CPS.
*And by 25 years old, I mean at the time, not now. Now they'd be in their 50s or worse. That Mr. Eisenhower, he was some guy.
"YOU'RE MAKING US LOOK STUPID! STOP IT!"
Do I think I'll ever be truly a "capital 'A' Atheist?" Probably not. Because I have seen or experienced things (at least in my perception) that lead me to reject the sterile realities of the science uber alles crowd. And while I am willing to concede the non-existence of God or Gods, I am not willing to concede that there is nothing "supernatural" out there. I mean seriously, today's magic is tomorrow's science after all, and science is only as good as the one practicing it. What is "supernatural" today, may be perfectly explainable in a year, decade or century. So I'm not willing to close my mind to certain things entirely just because you say so.
Also, I am unwilling to declare that teaching your children a religion or philosophy is, of itself, child abuse. Nor am I willing to declare that under-educating your children is child abuse, because quite frankly that would make millions of parents in under-privileged school districts guilty through no fault of their own (she says thinking "lovingly" of the 25 year old textbooks* of her youth). And I know that those of you declaring that "religion=child abuse" have your hearts in the right places, and the scars of your own religious upbringings fresh on your mind. But dictating no religion, A. Doesn't work (see Soviet Russia) and B. is no better than dictating any religion.
For those of you screeching about how all religion is child abuse and we MUST STOP IT! you need to realize that not everyone's experience of religion=child abuse. Some people, like Ogre, have fond memories of their youthful church attendance, but just could no longer believe in God. Seriously, ask him about Church Camp, or the little old ladies at his church. The stories are freaking hilarious.
I have no problem busting religions/the religious for abusive practices. I personally think that depriving children of medical care because "God said so" IS abuse. I also think that "beating the devil" out of a child or squashing them to death in an exorcism or any other "faith-based" death of a child should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and I do not believe that "it's our faith" is an extenuating circumstance. This goes double for "honor killings." We already have laws outlawing child abuse, we don't need to add "thought crimes" to the already over-burdened CPS.
*And by 25 years old, I mean at the time, not now. Now they'd be in their 50s or worse. That Mr. Eisenhower, he was some guy.
